Compare

Plausible vs Matomo

Two open-source analytics tools that most people shortlist together, and they are much less alike than that shortlist suggests. One does a single thing and asks nothing of you; the other tries to replace Google Analytics entirely and asks a good deal. Neither of them wrote this page, which is the reason it can say so.

Plausible and Matomo, side by side

PlausibleMatomo
Works without a cookie bannerOut of the box, with no configuration.YesConfigurable
Stores something on the visitor's deviceA cookie or an id in local storage. The law treats them the same.NoConfigurable
Counts every visit, without samplingBoth Google and Cloudflare sample adaptively, so a small site is not sampled at all. Hotjar does not sample; it stops, at a number of sessions set by the plan.YesYes
Keeps your full history for as long as you are a customerSkomi does not: it deletes analytics once the plan's window has passed, and the window each plan sells is on the pricing page. A cell reads "Not checked" where the product publishes no figure we could verify. Plausible documents "5+ years" for Enterprise but states nothing for its standard plans, and Cloudflare documents no retention period at all.Not checkedReports forever, raw data 24 months on cloud; your own database self-hosted
SitesYesYes
Mobile and desktop appsNoYes
HeatmapsNoYes
Session recordingsNoYes
Feedback boardsNoNo
Reports where your traffic comes fromYesYes
Data stored in the EUYesYour choice
Open sourceYesYes
Can be self-hostedYesYes
Surveys and user interviewsNoNot checked
More than one site on the free planSkomi's free plan carries one site, which is a real reason to pick something else if you look after several small ones. Google and Cloudflare read "Not checked" because how many sites their free tiers cover was not verified. That they HAVE a free tier is the row above.NoUnlimited, self-hosted
Free tierSkomi's is the Hobby plan: one site, no card.NoSelf-hosted only

Checked against each product on 6 September 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will fix it. A comparison table nobody corrects is a comparison table nobody should trust.

What they actually disagree about

Scope. Plausible measures web traffic. That is the whole product: visitors, sources, pages, goals, a dashboard somebody can read without training. Matomo aims at feature parity with Google Analytics (heatmaps, session recordings, app measurement, custom reports, a tag manager) and is a much larger thing to learn and to run.

Cookies. Plausible stores nothing on the visitor's device, full stop. Matomo can be configured that way and is not by default. If your reason for leaving Google Analytics is the consent banner, that difference is the whole decision: one of these removes the question and the other makes it a configuration you have to get right and keep right.

What running it costs you. Both are open source and both can be self-hosted. They are not equally easy to operate. Matomo is substantially the heavier, which is the price of the feature list. Plausible's cloud is the simpler path and it is a subscription; Matomo self-hosted is free of licence cost and paid for in server, upgrades and attention.

Money. Plausible has no free tier: you pay from the first day, on a cloud plan. Matomo is free if you host it yourself and sold as a cloud plan if you do not. "Free" therefore means two entirely different things in the same sentence, and the honest version is that Matomo's free option has an operator's time in it.

Apps. Matomo measures mobile apps. Plausible does not, and does not claim to. If software people install is part of what you need to understand, this ends the comparison on its own.

Choose Plausible if

You measure websites and nothing else, and you want the answer without a project.

Nothing is stored on the visitor's device, so the consent conversation does not happen. The dashboard is one page and a colleague can read it unaided, which matters more than most feature lists admit. You are paying a subscription from day one and you are getting somebody else's operational problem in return.

Pick it if the tool should be invisible: installed once, read occasionally, never thought about.

Choose Matomo if

You need more than page traffic, or the data has to be on infrastructure you control.

Heatmaps, session recordings and app measurement are in Matomo and are not in Plausible. Self-hosting means your own database, your own retention and no third party in the path at all, the strongest possible answer to where the data lives, paid for by being the person who patches it.

Pick it if you are replacing Google Analytics feature for feature, or if "our own servers" is a requirement rather than a preference. Budget the operating time honestly: it is the part people underestimate.

Who wrote this, and what we sell

We make Skomi, which competes with both of them, and it is deliberately not in the table above. A comparison of two other products with our own column wedged into it is an advertisement, and you would be right to discount the whole page for it.

The short version, so you can weigh it without hunting: Skomi stores nothing on the visitor's device like Plausible, includes heatmaps, recordings and feedback like Matomo, measures apps as well as sites, and is neither open source nor self-hostable, which is a real reason to choose either of the two above. Our history is also capped by plan, where a self-hosted Matomo's is not.

If that is worth reading about, the head-to-head pages are below. If it is not, the answer you came for is in the two sections above it.