Compare

Skomi and Microsoft Clarity

Microsoft Clarity is free, and Microsoft means it: no traffic limits, no sampling, unlimited projects, and heatmaps, session recordings and Copilot summaries on every one of them. For a behaviour tool that costs nothing it is remarkably complete, and a great many sites run it for exactly that reason.

What it costs is on the visitor's device. Clarity sets first- and third-party cookies, Microsoft's own documentation says to tell your users so, and as of September 2026 it requires an explicit consent signal for visitors from the EEA, the UK and Switzerland. Without it, by Microsoft's own table, each page view becomes a new session and nobody is ever a returning user.

Skomi and Microsoft Clarity, side by side

SkomiMicrosoft Clarity
Works without a cookie bannerOut of the box, with no configuration.YesNo
Stores something on the visitor's deviceA cookie or an id in local storage. The law treats them the same.NoYes
Counts every visit, without samplingBoth Google and Cloudflare sample adaptively, so a small site is not sampled at all. Hotjar does not sample; it stops, at a number of sessions set by the plan.YesYes
Keeps your full history for as long as you are a customerSkomi does not: it deletes analytics once the plan's window has passed, and the window each plan sells is on the pricing page. A cell reads "Not checked" where the product publishes no figure we could verify. Plausible documents "5+ years" for Enterprise but states nothing for its standard plans, and Cloudflare documents no retention period at all.NoNo
SitesYesYes
Mobile and desktop appsYesYes
HeatmapsYesYes
Session recordingsYesYes
Feedback boardsYesNo
Reports where your traffic comes fromYesYes
Data stored in the EUYesNo
Open sourceNoCapture script only
Can be self-hostedNoNo
Surveys and user interviewsNoNo
More than one site on the free planSkomi's free plan carries one site, which is a real reason to pick something else if you look after several small ones. Google and Cloudflare read "Not checked" because how many sites their free tiers cover was not verified. That they HAVE a free tier is the row above.NoYes
Free tierSkomi's is the Hobby plan: one site, no card.YesYes

Checked against each product on 6 September 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will fix it. A comparison table nobody corrects is a comparison table nobody should trust.

Where Skomi differs from Microsoft Clarity

Nothing on the visitor's device, so no consent gate. Clarity's FAQ answers "do I need to inform my users of the cookie Clarity uses?" with a plain yes, and its documentation lists what degrades without consent in Europe: sessions counted as page views, every user new, funnels showing a full drop-off. Skomi derives identity on the server from a secret replaced every day: no cookie, no local storage, and no region where the product quietly stops working.

Your data stays in the EU, and stays longer. Clarity stores data in Azure and describes an EU customer's data as a cross-border transfer to Microsoft Corporation in the United States under standard contractual clauses; it keeps 30 days. Skomi stores in the EU and keeps analytics for the window your plan sells: 90 days on the free plan, up to five years on the largest. Recordings on Skomi's smaller plans are kept 30 days too, which is a tie.

Acquisition and feedback in the same place. Clarity reports channel, source and referrer as filters on behaviour; it has no feedback widget, no public board and no surveys. Microsoft's own blog pairs it with a third-party WordPress plugin for those. Skomi's feedback widget and board share the account, the site and the bill with its analytics.

What Microsoft Clarity does better

It is free with no limits, and that is not a trial. No traffic cap, no sampling, unlimited projects, and heatmaps and recordings on all of them. Skomi's free plan carries one site and one app and meters behaviour as credits. If the bill is the deciding factor, Clarity wins and it is not close.

The insight layer. Dead clicks, quick-backs, excessive scrolling and JavaScript errors surfaced automatically, session summaries written by Copilot, funnels, smart events and a benchmark against other sites. Skomi records and shows; it does not narrate.

Microsoft behind it. A Google Analytics integration, an advertising dashboard, SDKs for Android, iOS, Flutter and React Native, and a support organisation Skomi does not have.

Which to choose

Choose Microsoft Clarity if the budget is zero, you are content to run a consent banner for European visitors and to have Microsoft hold the data (its FAQ says plainly that Microsoft has access to it) and you want the deepest free behaviour tooling there is.

Choose Skomi if you want heatmaps and recordings without cookies or a consent gate, data stored in the EU and kept longer than a month, and traffic, behaviour and feedback in one account.

One script, or one SDK. The same reports either way.

Create an account, register a site, and switch on what you need.