Compare

Skomi and Hotjar

Hotjar is now Contentsquare. As of September 2026 hotjar.com redirects to Contentsquare, its pricing page redirects to Contentsquare's pricing, and Contentsquare's own landing page is headed "the next evolution of Hotjar". Existing Hotjar plans still run, and Contentsquare publishes a table contrasting Hotjar Free with Contentsquare Free, but a new customer buys Contentsquare.

If you are reading this because your heatmap tool changed underneath you, that is the situation. Hotjar is a behaviour tool: heatmaps, session replay and surveys. It has always been excellent at that, and it has never told you where your visitors came from.

Skomi and Hotjar, side by side

SkomiHotjar
Works without a cookie bannerOut of the box, with no configuration.YesNo
Stores something on the visitor's deviceA cookie or an id in local storage. The law treats them the same.NoYes
Counts every visit, without samplingBoth Google and Cloudflare sample adaptively, so a small site is not sampled at all. Hotjar does not sample; it stops, at a number of sessions set by the plan.YesCapped per plan
Keeps your full history for as long as you are a customerSkomi does not: it deletes analytics once the plan's window has passed, and the window each plan sells is on the pricing page. A cell reads "Not checked" where the product publishes no figure we could verify. Plausible documents "5+ years" for Enterprise but states nothing for its standard plans, and Cloudflare documents no retention period at all.NoNot checked
SitesYesYes
Mobile and desktop appsYesNot checked
HeatmapsYesYes
Session recordingsYesYes
Feedback boardsYesYes
Reports where your traffic comes fromYesNo
Data stored in the EUYesNot checked
Open sourceNoNo
Can be self-hostedNoNo
Surveys and user interviewsNoYes
More than one site on the free planSkomi's free plan carries one site, which is a real reason to pick something else if you look after several small ones. Google and Cloudflare read "Not checked" because how many sites their free tiers cover was not verified. That they HAVE a free tier is the row above.NoNot checked
Free tierSkomi's is the Hobby plan: one site, no card.YesYes

Checked against each product on 6 September 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we will fix it. A comparison table nobody corrects is a comparison table nobody should trust.

Where Skomi differs from Hotjar

It is the other half of the question. Hotjar shows you what people did on a page. It does not report acquisition (no sources, no campaigns, no revenue attribution) so it has always been something you run alongside an analytics tool rather than instead of one. Skomi is both, which is one script, one bill and one place where "this campaign brought people who then rage-clicked the checkout" is a single question rather than two tools and a guess.

Recordings are priced as recordings, not as your whole plan. Hotjar's unit is the captured session, and its free tier is capped at 35 a day. Skomi meters heatmaps and recordings as credits from the same allowance your analytics uses, so recording a sample of traffic costs a share of one balance instead of a second subscription.

Nothing is stored on the visitor's device. Session recording normally requires it, and Hotjar's does. Skomi records with identity derived on the server from a secret replaced every day, so on the default setting there is no cookie, no local storage and no consent gate in front of your heatmaps.

What Hotjar does better

Surveys are a real product, and Skomi's are not. Hotjar has a survey builder, targeting, and recruiting for user interviews. Skomi has a feedback widget and a public board, which are useful and a much smaller thing wearing a similar name. If asking structured questions is the job, Hotjar does it and Skomi does not.

It is the more mature behaviour tool, with years of work behind the replay player and the heatmap tooling, and now with Contentsquare's error and performance monitoring, funnels and AI summaries on top. If behaviour analysis is your product and traffic reporting is somebody else's problem, that depth is worth more than breadth.

Which to choose

Choose Hotjar, or Contentsquare, which is what you will be buying, if surveys and user interviews matter, or if you want the deepest behaviour tooling and already have analytics elsewhere.

Choose Skomi if you would rather have acquisition and behaviour in one place, on one bill, without a consent banner in front of either.

One script, or one SDK. The same reports either way.

Create an account, register a site, and switch on what you need.